Backtested · out-of-sample · honest

The best indicator for every asset.
Proven by backtest.

Everyone sells indicators. We tested them. IndicatorEdge backtests the top technical indicators across every major asset and timeframe to show you what actually works — per asset, with the numbers, and honest about where nothing beats buy-and-hold.

1,999backtests run
37assets
20indicators
20beat buy & hold
Top edges vs buy & hold
AssetIndicatorTFAlpha
DogecoinEMA-10 TrendD+34.4%
CardanoBollinger BreakoutD+33.0%
SolanaRSI Trend (>50)D+29.9%
XRPBollinger BreakoutD+27.8%
EthereumRSI Trend (>50)D+25.1%
Natural GasWaveTrend (8/6/4)H+13.5%
BNBRate of ChangeD+7.0%
See all 37 assets
Pick your market

What actually works, per asset

Everyone sells the same indicators for everything. We tested which one actually wins on each asset — and which timeframe.

Why trust this

We're honest about what doesn't work

No curve-fitting, no cherry-picked windows, no 90%-win-rate fantasies. Standard settings, realistic fees, and an out-of-sample test every strategy has to survive. When nothing beats buy-and-hold, we tell you.

  • Real price history. We pull real OHLCV market data (multiple years to multiple decades per asset, depending on availability) for every asset and timeframe.
  • Standard settings — no curve-fitting. Every indicator is tested with its standard, textbook parameters. We deliberately do NOT tune settings per asset, because that's how backtests get faked. This is a fair fight.
  • One canonical rule per indicator. Each indicator gets one sensible, conventional long/flat strategy (e.g. trend indicators stay long while bullish; oscillators buy oversold and exit overbought).
  • Realistic costs. Every trade pays ~0.08% per side for commission and slippage, so the numbers aren't a frictionless fantasy.
  • Out-of-sample validation. We split the history and re-test on data the strategy never 'saw.' An indicator only counts as a real edge for an asset if it held up out-of-sample — that's our guard against overfitting.
Read the full methodology
The honest part

20 of 37 assets had an indicator that beat buy-and-hold on return, out-of-sample. For most of the rest — especially the big indices — holding won on raw return, though the best indicator still cut risk sharply. We label both, honestly, on every page. That's the difference between research and a sales pitch.

Educational information only — not investment advice. Hypothetical backtested results; past performance does not guarantee future results. Trading involves risk of loss.

Free · no spam

Get the weekly edge report

The best-performing indicator per asset, what changed this week, and the honest caveats — straight to your inbox.